Ethics in Private and Public Relationships

For a Civil Servant, there cannot be clear distinctions between personal and professional life.  What is the scope of private ethics and public ethics? What are their distinctions and features? Read further to find more.

It is crucial to regularly evaluate your moral standards to make sure they are solid and well-founded because legislation, culture, and religion can diverge from what is good. To be ethical, we must continually work to understand our moral principles and behavior and to make sure that we uphold them in our daily lives.

Ethics play a crucial role in both private and public relationships, shaping the behavior, decisions, and interactions of individuals and institutions.

While the principles of ethics are applicable across various contexts, the dynamics differ between private relationships, which involve individuals or private entities, and public relationships, which involve interactions within the broader societal and governmental framework.

Ethics in Private Relationships

It refers to the moral principles that a person adheres to when dealing with others and circumstances in daily life. Relationships with family and friends are a big part of it.

They are informal since they are built on emotional ties rather than any official mechanism that governs them. Private connections are frequently passed down or inherited.

They are more forgiving of flaws and relatively permanent.

Private relationships’ ethics are typically governed by personal qualities, enduring human values, religion, social standards, and the law of the state.

Private religious law also regulates ethics in intimate relationships. Since ancient times, individual familial and community commitments have been codified in law and supported by severe penalties, as seen in inheritance, divorce, marriage, and other laws.

Religious institutions, constitutional provisions, and moral norms all control ethical questions in private relationships in India.

Principles of Ethics Private Relationships

The following are the certain principles associated with ethics in private relationships.

Siding with the truth

In private partnerships, honesty is the first requirement. It enhances the emotional ties in these partnerships and increases the level of mutual trust. For instance, being honest at all times helps one avoid disputes that can result from their purported unusual activity.

Being Confidential

Secrecy and privacy are of the utmost significance to protect the sacredness of private interactions. For instance, we usually exercise restraint when disclosing secrets about our friends, coworkers, life partners, etc. without getting their consent to avoid upsetting these relationships.

Being Tolerant

In private interactions, there will inevitably be a conflict if there are no established rules and regulations because human beings can never attain perfection.

To make such interactions peaceful and harmonious, one must accept the flaws of others.

Being Affectionate

Affection and caring shared emotionally transcend all boundaries. This connection is motivated by human emotions rather than by laws or exchanges of favors.

Ethics in Public Relationships

It refers to the moral principles that a person may follow when engaging in conversations and conducting business in their line of work.

Relationships in the public eye exist due to a person’s occupation or position in the workforce.

Principles of Ethics in Public Relationships

In honor of its first Chairman, Lord Nolan, the Committee on Standards in Public Life was occasionally referred to as the Nolan Committee.

There have been fourteen reports issued so far based on the Nolan Committee’s Seven Principles of Ethical Conduct. The Seven Principles of Public Life were established in the Committee’s First Report. They are

Selfness

People in positions of power should only operate in the public interest. They shouldn’t do any act to benefit financially or in another way for themselves, their family, or their friends.

Integrity

Holders of public office should avoid putting themselves in any kind of debt to outside parties that might try to use that debt as leverage when it comes to carrying out their official duties.

Objectivity

Holders of public office should base their decisions on impartial criteria when conducting official business, such as appointing public officials, granting contracts, or suggesting people for prizes and perks.

Accountability

Holders of public office are answerable to the public for their choices and deeds and are required to put up with whatever scrutiny is suitable for their position.

Openness

All choices and acts that public office holders do should be as transparent as possible. Only when the larger public interest clearly demands should they withhold information and provide justification for their judgments.

Honesty

Holders of public office are required to disclose any private interests that may conflict with their official responsibilities and to take action to resolve any such conflicts in a way that safeguards the public interest.

Leadership

Public officeholders should lead by example and support these values by doing so.

What is the relationship between Ethics in Private and Public relationships?

The distinction between private and public ethics is questionable since we must adhere to the same ethical principles in both our private and public lives. No dichotomous relationship can exist between the two.

Ethics applies to both equally because it encourages leading a good life.

It is quite unlikely that one can expect someone who lacks morals in public to possess them in private and vice versa.

A government servant’s treatment of female coworkers and the existence of gender bias in the rules he implements are directly related to how he treats women in his household.

Public and professional relations can occasionally develop into personal relationships. As an illustration, consider the teacher-student connection.

Sometimes in class, professors utilize personal examples with the students, and the students also discuss their areas of weakness with the teachers so that the latter can assist in the progress. Because of the kind of bond the two have been sharing, the relationship has thus, on some level, become intimate.

Conclusion

There must be no contradiction between ethics in private and public relationships as this may cause some people to feel frustrated, guilty, confused, and disoriented. They each help to strengthen and mold the other.

They must be compatible with one another to foster personal growth. However, too much congruence can also cause ideas and reforms to stagnate.

For instance, it will be challenging to bring about socio-cultural changes if no one in public service is reform-minded and congruent with the current society.

Click here to read more on GS-4 notes

Article Written By: Jis John Sebastian